Watchdog One – Week in Review – February 10, 2018

More links, less pontification. Welcome back to another abbreviated edition of the Watchdog One weekly, by Jason Mojica. Please make sure to follow us on Twitter: @watchdog_one / Tell your friends to SUBSCRIBE / Send us tips: / Let us know what you think:


The other memo
Here’s CNN’s breakdown of Trump’s refusal to release the Democratic response to the Nunes memo [CNN]

– Here’s the Project on Government Oversight’s Executive Director applauding the fact that at least the members of the House Intelligence Committee will gain access to the underlying classified documents that inspired the Nunes memo. [POGO]

The White House’s internal version of extreme vetting
– David Frum asks “Why Didn’t the White House See Domestic Violence as Disqualifying?” [The Atlantic]

Here’s Politico’s take on how the White House is handling its crisis of the week. [Politico]

But wait, there’s more [Washington Post]

How much of your money the Federal Government will spend over the next two years
– The folks at ClearanceJobs see defense spending as the winner in the budget deal, which means… more jobs for folks with a security clearance. (No clearance? Try the White House). [ClearanceJobs]

– Veronique de Rugy at Reason opines that “The Senate budget deal proves Republicans love government spending” [Reason]

The budget will allow Medicare to pay for a range of new benefits and services including managed care and home-delivered meals [Forbes]

Fig Newmans got a tax break [Bloomberg]

The DACA can got kicked down the road [CNN]


The DoD’s internal watchdog testified that there are fewer members of the military being found guilty of misconduct
The Department of Defense’s acting Inspector General, Glenn Fine, testified on Capitol Hill (video) Wednesday about the procedures for investigating misconduct by senior leadership in the military. The DoD IG released data on Wednesday as part of Fine’s prepared statement that suggests that fewer members of the military are being found guilty of misconduct. But that’s due in part to the fact that more cases are being dismissed as not credible, the Associated Press’ Lolita C. Baldor reports. “There were 803 complaints filed in the fiscal year that ended last Sept. 30, compared to 787 the previous year. But just 144 were deemed credible and investigated by the IG, and 49 senior officials were eventually found guilty of misconduct.” [Read more from the AP via The Washington Post]

The DoD released its new harassment policy
On Thursday, the DoD released Instruction 1020.03: Harassment Prevention and Response in the Armed Forces. A department press release explained that this is a comprehensive policy that included sexual harassment and harassment through social media, before reminding us all that all DoD policy ultimately comes down to improving the military’s ability to kill people and break things: “The department’s policy strives to provide an atmosphere of dignity and respect and an environment free from discrimination, harassment and assault, to increase the readiness and lethality of the armed forces.” [Read more from DoD]

Related: Sexual assault reports doubled at West Point [Army Times]

Related: ‘Continuum Of Harm’: The Military Has Been Fighting Sexual Assault In Its Ranks For Decades, But Women Say It’s Still Happening [Task & Purpose]

President Trump set the ball in motion for formalized “extreme vetting”
On Tuesday, the President signed a memorandum establishing a “National Vetting Center” that in addition to seeking to coordinate “efforts to identify individuals who present a threat to national security, border security, homeland security, or public safety,” also creates a new director-level position to be designated by the Department of Homeland Security. DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen said in a statement, “The National Vetting Center will support unprecedented work by DHS and the entire U.S. intelligence community to keep terrorists, violent criminals, and other dangerous individuals from reaching our shores.” [Read more from the White House]

The first meeting of the “Cuba Internet Task Force” took place
Created by a Presidential memorandum late last year, the task force is part of the Trump administration’s tougher stance on Cuba. In its inaugural meeting, members of the task force agreed to… meet again, and to form some subcommittees which will make some recommendations within six months. This is somewhat ironic because, as Reuters reports, under the Obama administration’s improved relations with Cuba in 2015-2016, “Cuba significantly expanded internet access, introducing Wi-Fi hotspots in public spaces and connecting more homes to the web. A handful of independent, web-based news outlets emerged too, chipping away at state media. Several of those outlets have said they want nothing to do with Trump’s free press initiative, which they fear creates the impression they are mouthpieces of the United States.” [Read more from Reuters]

Related – Cuba hands note of protest to U.S. over internet task force [Reuters]

The US continued to be at war in Syria
Syria and Russia condemned the United States’ military presence in Syria as ‘illegal’ Thursday after an overnight confrontation in which U.S. warplanes bombed pro-Syrian-government forces as they approached an American-supported base,” reports the Liz Sly in the Washington Post. “U.S. forces targeted the pro-government troops with airstrikes and artillery after they launched an attack against a base belonging to the U.S.-backed Syrian Democratic Forces in the eastern province of Deir al-Zour, according to Col. Thomas F. Veale, a U.S. military spokesman.” [Read more from The Washington Post]

Related: US Secretary of Defense James Mattis on the “perplexing situation” that led to the attack in Syria. [DoD]


US Secretly Negotiated with Russians to Buy Stolen NSA Documents – and the Russians Offered Trump-Related Material, Too [The Intercept]

ICE Wants to Be an Intelligence Agency Under Trump [The Daily Beast]

Russians penetrated U.S. voter systems, top U.S. official says [NBC News]

Inquiry of Soldiers’ Deaths Urges Curtailing West Africa Missions [New York Times]



CBP Ensures Pest-free Flowers for Valentine’s Day [CPB]

Senators Ponder How to Break Criminal Justice Logjam [Roll Call]

Former Homeland Security Investigations Special Agent Sentenced to Prison for Accepting Bribes to Dismiss Indictment Against Colombian Narcotics Kingpin [DOJ]

Latest Wells Fargo Penalties Add Fuel to Dodd-Frank Debate [Roll Call]

Statement from FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, M.D., on the agency’s scientific evidence on the presence of opioid compounds in kratom, underscoring its potential for abuse [FDA]



Joseph Daneil Hudek, a Florida man who consumed marijuana edibles, tried to open the exit door of a plane en route to China, and then started a brawl with flight attendants and passengers who tried to stop him pled guity to four felonies in federal court on Friday. According to a DOJ press release, “The plane had just passed over Vancouver Island and was over the Pacific Ocean when Hudek came out of the first class bathroom and in an agitated state attempted to raise the lever of the exit door of the aircraft. Two flight attendants attempted to stop Hudek and he threw one to the floor and punched the other. When a passenger attempted to assist the flight attendants, HUDEK hit him over the head with a wine bottle.” [Read more at Q13 Fox]

Watchdog One – Week in Review – February 3, 2018

Welcome back to an abbreviated edition of the Watchdog One weekly, by Jason Mojica. Please make sure to follow us on Twitter: @watchdog_one / Tell your friends to SUBSCRIBE / Send us tips: / Let us know what you think:


The Memo
– Here’s the Nunes memo annotated [Politico]
– Here’s a touch of detail about the counter memo from the Democrats [NYT]
– Lawfare has put together a timeline of the life and times of Devin Nunes, from the transition to #MemoDay [Lawfare]
– Mother Jones has put together a timeline of Jeff Sessions’ recusal violations from Bill O’Reilley to #MemoDay [Mother Jones]
666: The Memo of the Beast [CNBC]


Victor Cha’s ideas about how to avoid the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans didn’t sit too well with the Trump administration
A couple of hours before President Trump gave his first State of the Union on Tuesday, in which he would use as props a North Korean defector and the parents of a young American whose trip to the DPRK led to his untimely demise, the Washington Post reported that the man widely expected to become the next US Ambassador to South Korea was no longer in consideration for the role, largely due to disagreements over North Korea policy. “Victor D. Cha, an academic who served in the George W. Bush administration, raised his concerns with National Security Council officials over their consideration of a limited strike on the North aimed at sending a message without sparking a wider war — a risky concept known as a “bloody nose” strategy,” the Post reported. Just as the news was sinking in that a very sane person was no longer being considered for what is arguably the country’s most important diplomatic post at this time, and moments before the SOTU was about to begin, the Post dropped an op-ed by Cha himself. In the piece, Cha argues against… well, making moves that could quickly escalate into “a war that would likely kill tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of Americans.” He says he empathizes with the hope of some Trump officials that a military strike would shock the regime of Kim Jong Un into taking the US seriously and lead to its denuclearization, but that “there is a point at which hope must give in to logic. If we believe that Kim is undeterrable without such a strike, how can we also believe that a strike will deter him from responding in kind? And if Kim is unpredictable, impulsive and bordering on irrational, how can we control the escalation ladder, which is premised on an adversary’s rational understanding of signals and deterrence?” [Read more from Cha at The Washington Post]

Trump’s SOTU gave us a new term to unpack: “campaign of maximum pressure”
If you were in receipt of the news about Cha’s conflict with the Trump administration over its ideas about how to solve a problem like North Korea, aspects of the President’s speech took on a more ominous tone. “North Korea’s reckless pursuit of nuclear missiles could very soon threaten our homeland. We are waging a campaign of maximum pressure to prevent that from happening,” said President Trump. “Past experience has taught us that complacency and concessions only invite aggression and provocation. I will not repeat the mistakes of past administrations that got us into this dangerous position. We need only look at the depraved character of the North Korean regime to understand the nature of the nuclear threat it could pose to America and our allies.” And then, as an example of said depraved character, President Trump recounted the story of American university student Otto Warmbier as the cameras turned to his crying parents in the audience. “You are powerful witnesses to a menace that threatens our world, and your strength inspires us all. Tonight, we pledge to honor Otto’s memory with American resolve.” [Read more from the SOTU transcript at]

A group of Senators politely told Trump they are alarmed by the disturbing, superficial, fiscally irresponsible Nuclear Posture Review
Their words, not ours. 16 Democratic Senators signed on to a letter that urges President Trump to reconsider… pretty much everything contained in the leaked version of the now-released Nuclear Posture Review. “The sole purpose of our nuclear arsenal should be to deter nuclear attack against the United States, our allies and partners,” wrote the Senators. “However, the reported policies outlined in your forthcoming Nuclear Posture Review increase the risk of a nuclear arms race and raise the real possibility of nuclear conflict. As the world’s greatest nuclear power and the only nation that has ever used nuclear weapons in combat, we have a unique responsibility to continue to lead the international community towards eventual nuclear disarmament.” [Read more from the letter at]

Joe Kennedy talked tough on drugs
Proving he’s no Jack Kennedy, the representative from the 4th district of Massachusetts, gave the Democratic response to the SOTU on Tuesday night with the conviction of someone who has been led to believe that he really knows how to connect with an audience. Kennedy talked of an America that fights for all its citizens, “because the greatest, strongest, richest nation in the world shouldn’t have to leave anyone behind.” He referenced in particular the plight families of people suffering through opioid addiction, and suggested that the Democrats offer a healthcare system that offers “mercy” to addicts. Lee Fang at the Intercept points out that this is a bit rich, considering Kennedy’s, “most consequential action as a federal legislator… was to push a bill that gave the opioid industry a shot at watering down prescription guidelines first implemented by the Obama administration.” [Read more at the Intercept]

Jeff Sessions talked tough on drugs
Seeming to presage that the president would talk about the need to crack down on “dealers and pushers” in his SOTU, on Tuesday, Jeff Sessions announced a “surge” of DEA Special Agents, Diversion Investigators, and Intelligence Research Specialists to crack down on prescription drug diversion. For the next month-and-a-half these folks will “focus on pharmacies and prescribers who are dispensing unusual or disproportionate amounts of drugs.” To do this, the DOJ says it will utilize data from approximately 80 million transaction reports it collects every year from prescription drug manufacturers and distributors. We’re curious how the DOJ will define “unusual” or “disproportionate,” so we asked. However, the agency did not respond to our request for comment.

Related: Sessions’ new crackdown on drug prescribers won’t stop the opioid crisis [Think Progress]

Mick Mulvaney defanged the Office of Fair Lending and Equal Opportunity
On Thursday, the Washington Post’s Renae Merle broke the story that the acting head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Mick Mulvaney, stripped the office responsible for pursuing discrimination cases of its enforcement powers. “The Office of Fair Lending and Equal Opportunity has headed up some of the CFPB’s most high-profile cases, including a 2015 settlement against Hudson City Savings Bank, a New Jersey-based bank accused of racially discriminating against minority mortgage borrowers,” the Post reported. “The bank was required to provide $25 million in loan subsidies in what the CFPB called the country’s largest settlement in a redlining case.” The office transferred inside the Director’s Office, becoming part of the Office of Equal Opportunity and Fairness. In a statement provided to Watchdog One, the CFPB argued that the agency is merely finding efficiencies. “The Bureau’s statutory mandate includes the supervision and enforcement of fair lending laws and regulations, and the Bureau will continue to perform those functions. The fact is, it never made sense to have two separate and duplicative supervision and enforcement functions within the same agency – one for all cases except fair lending, and the other only for fair lending cases,” read the statement from John Czwartacki, Senior Advisor to the Acting Director. “By announcing our intent to combine these efforts under one roof, we gain efficiency and consistency without sacrificing effectiveness. And by elevating the Office of Fair Lending to the Director’s Office, we have enhanced its ability to focus on its other important responsibilities.” [Read more from The Washington Post]

Here’s Mulvaney’s original email to CFPB staff [Watchdog One].

Related: Consumer protection bureau structure upheld in blow to Trump’s deregulation efforts [CNBC]

A Texas Republican has threatened to subpoena the DHS over documents related its use of Kaperski software
Texas Republican Lamar Smith – chairman of the House Science, Space, and Technology Committee – wants to know where his documents are. On Thursday, Smith threatened to subpoena the department if they didn’t turn over documents that his committee asked for in December relating to the department’s ban on the use of cyber security products by the Russia-based company Kaperski. The DHS apparently told committee staff that they wouldn’t be turning over any more documents due to pending litigation – presumably Russia-based Kapersky’s legal challenge on the federal government’s ban on its products filed on January 17. [Read the letter at]


White House seeks 72 percent cut to clean energy research, underscoring administration’s preference for fossil fuels [Washington Post]

Lesson of 2017: Political campaign season truly never ends [Center for Public Integrity]

Administration’s Syria Policy Envisions Continued U.S. Presence [Congressional Research Service]

INTERNET OF THINGS: Enhanced Assessments and Guidance Are Needed to Address Security Risks in DOD [GAO]

The THIRTY-EIGHTH quarterly report by the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction [SIGAR]


Pentagon to expand GITMO after Trump orders it remain open [Inside Defense]

Husband of former Trump household aide scores government job [Politico]

Trump appointee tells coal industry that his job is to be ‘an advocate’ for coal [Think Progress}

Why the CDC director had to resign [Politico]

Congressman’s Bill Would Force Trump Administration to Fulfill Pledge to Study Racial Disparities in Auto Insurance Pricing [ProPublica]

Amid low morale, highest-ranked career official at State to step down [Politico]

US Mission to the UN dissed Russia on Twitter [Politico]


This week, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, Benjamin G. Greenberg, sentenced a Florida man with two concurrent two-month sentences for “intimidating a flight attendant of an aircraft in flight in the United States.” According to a DOJ press release, Michael Anthony Minko, 36, of White Springs, Florida took Xanax (or its generic equivalent) and “drank an excessive amount of whiskey from a bottle in his possession,” while onboard a Spirit airlines flight. He then “cursed, used abusive language, made verbal threats and exhibited threatening actions.” In a rare moment of solidarity between employees of a budget airline and the people who fly it, “a flight attendant and three passengers used plastic flex cuffs to secure Minko’s hands behind his back.”


Watchdog One – Week in Review – January 20, 2018

Welcome back to the Watchdog One weekly, by Jason Mojica. Please make sure to follow us on Twitter: @watchdog_one / Tell your friends to SUBSCRIBE / Send us tips: / Let us know what you think:


The “shutdown” of the Federal Government
– Here’s a handy chart of who gets sent home as a result [Washington Post]
Here’s what happens to FEMA, coming off a historic (or as we like to say, “an historic”) year of natural disasters. [Washington Post]

FISA passing in the Senate
– Here’s how your favorite Senator voted [US Senate]
– Here’s how US Government-run Voice of America reported it to international audiences [VOA]

A CIA officer who got arrested at JFK for one thing but is “suspected” of others
– The official DOJ press release here. [DOJ]
– “Sources familiar with the case” expand on things here. [NBC News]
– Read the full complaint here. [DOJ]

Bannon getting subpoenaed by Mueller
Here’s Michael Schmidt on the story. [NYT]
Here’s Breitbart on the story, which they apparently got from… Michael Schmidt. [Breitbart]


The House solution to avert the shutdown stands to give Trump new powers
The temporary spending bill that passed in the House Thursday night included language that would give the Trump administration the power to shift intelligence money from one project to another without notifying congress. That’s according to Ryan Grim at The Intercept, who broke the story a day before The Washington Post’s hedgier version of it, which was later corrected to say that, in fact, “the president would still have to notify Congress of any changes made to the budget, and could not operate fully in secret.” Whether that correction is indeed correct is unclear. In any case, it certainly got Senator Wyden’s attention, who Tweeted, “It would be extraordinarily dangerous for the Senate to give this administration new powers to work around Congress, particularly now, with the IC’s vast spying authorities and the most political CIA director in memory.” Keep your eye on any proposed solutions to the current government shutdown to see if this language survives.  [Read more from The Intercept]

The DOJ & DHS exhibited some fuzzy math on terrorism
The Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security released a joint report on Tuesday that claimed, among other things, that approximately 73% of individuals convicted of international terrorism charges (emphasis added) in US courts were foreign-born. This is kind of like saying that most Japanese cars are made in Japan. Still, President Trump ran with it, making an official statement that “nearly 3 in 4 individuals convicted of terrorism-related charges are foreign-born” and connected the stat to the need for immigration reform.
– In response to this, the folks over at Lawfare politely pointed out that, “even excluding domestic terrorism cases, it was possible to support the president’s claim only if one counted as foreign-born terrorism suspects people the United States had actively imported in order to prosecute for terrorism or terrorism-related crimes.” [Read more from Lawfare]

The House refused to decide whether the President should be impeached
The House voted 355-66 to table a motion to impeach President Trump. It was the third attempt by Rep. Al Green (D-TX). [Read more from Roll Call]

The math was less fuzzy at the Department of the Interior
More than three out of four individuals on the National Park System Advisory board quit on Wednesday, citing frustration that Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke “had refused to meet with them or convene a single meeting last year,” according to The Washington Post. [Read more]

HHS is giving healthcare workers so much religious freedom, their heads will spin
On Thursday, two days after President Trump used his Religious Freedom Day proclamation to call attention to the plight of those who have been threatened with “tax consequences for particular forms of religious speech” or forced to “comply with laws that violate their core religious beliefs,” his administration announced a new civil rights division within the Department of Health and Human Services, designed to protect healthcare workers who refuse services on religious or moral grounds. The Washington Post reports that the division “will consider complaints from doctors, nurses and others who feel they have been pressured by employers to ‘perform, accommodate or assist with’ procedures that violate their beliefs. If a complaint about coercion or retribution is found to be valid, an entity receiving federal dollars could have that funding revoked.” [Read more from The Washington Post]

– Earlier this month, in response to a FOIA request from BuzzFeed News, the HHS quietly posted thousands comments the agency had previously withheld regarding a proposed rule that would remove barriers for religious and faith-based organizations to participate in public programs and receive public funding. The majority of the comments we saw were of the copy and paste variety, beginning with the statement, “The mission of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is to put the health and well-being of the public first. But instead of working to ensure everyone has equal access to comprehensive and nondiscriminatory services, HHS is asking for suggestions on how to expand the use of religious beliefs to discriminate and deny patients health care.” [Read more from BuzzFeed News]

A federal judge heard arguments on the Trump White House’s use of encrypted messaging apps
On Wednesday, US District Court Judge Christopher Cooper heard arguments relating to a lawsuit that charges that President Trump and his staff “seek to evade transparency and government accountability,” particularly through the use of “email messaging applications that destroy the contents of messages as soon as they are read, without regard to whether the messages are presidential records.” Politico’s Josh Gerstein writes, “During a 45-minute hearing, Cooper—an appointee of President Barack Obama—sounded uncomfortable with the government’s claim that the courts have no role at all in enforcing the Presidential Records Act. However, the judge also seemed reluctant to embark on an unbounded, free-range inquiry into whether the Trump White House is policing its staff’s compliance with record keeping obligations. And he appeared even more skeptical about delving into claims that the Trump White House is using executive orders to steer policy decisions out of federal agencies whose records are subject to request under the Freedom of Information Act.” [Read more from Politco]

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau will get no money next quarter… kinda
Mick Mulvaney, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget who you’ve seen on TV a lot this week, requested exactly zero dollars for next quarter’s operation of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (of which he is the acting director). That headline might be enough to get your blood up, but when you realize that it’s because the bureau has $177mm currently sitting in the bank (read: $32mm more than it needs), it’s a bit less meaningful. That is, until next quarter. Stay tuned. [Read more from Politico]

A former CIA agent, convicted of leaking classified info to a journalist, was released from federal prison
Jeffrey Sterling, a former CIA agent convicted of leaking classified material to then New York Times reporter James Risen, was released from prison on Tuesday. “The key evidence that persuaded a jury to convict Sterling on nine felony counts consisted of phone records and emails that showed Sterling and Risen had communicated with each other,” Peter Maass explains at The Intercept. “However, those records did not disclose anything about the content of their conversations. All the government knew, and all the jury knew, is that they had communicated.” [Read more from The Intercept]


The DNI updated its policy on classified leaks
Steven Aftergood, Director of the Federation of American Scientists Project on Government Secrecy, noticed this week that the Director of National Intelligence recently updated its procedures for dealing with leaks of classified information. Most notably, Aftergood points out that, “It presents an expansive definition of an unauthorized disclosure that includes not simply disclosure but also the ‘confirmation’ or ‘acknowledgement’ of classified information to an unauthorized person.” The directive also lays out a three-tiered hierarchy that advises on how and when agencies should engage the DOJ once a leak has occurred.

A US official told Watchdog One that the reason for the update to the original 2007 directive was that this version takes into account the role of the Intelligence Community (IC) Inspector General, a position that did not exist until 2010. The official explained that the directive addresses “how the IC can address an issue in a meaningful, consistent way, when DOJ declines prosecution.”

The official also claimed that the directive did not expand the definition of what the agency considers an unauthorized disclosures, “rather it spells out what is meant [by the term], which includes confirmation or acknowledgment – which would have also fallen under the 2007 version of the directive, though it wasn’t explicitly stated.”

There is, of course, another way of reading the tea leaves on this. Aftergood told Watchdog One that this new directive makes leaks the subject of senior IC attention. “A directive like this sends a message throughout the bureaucracy that dealing with leaks is a priority. That in turn could have implications for how resources are allocated, and how aggressive leak investigations become. The directive may serve a deterrent function all by itself, so that fewer leaks take place, and it may tip the balance in favor of criminal prosecutions, so that more of those also occur.”

The implications for members of the press, who love a good leak, are unclear. “The executive branch, even in the Trump administration, has an interest in being able to communicate candidly with members of the press,” said Aftergood. Sometimes that means going beyond the strict limitations of the classification system and bending the rules a bit. In other words, in real life administration officials are not categorically opposed to all leaks” [Read more from FAS]

Mueller is following the (Russian) money
Jason Leopold and Anthony Cormier of BuzzFeed News revealed on Wednesday that Special counsel Robert Mueller’s team is examining a number of suspicious banking transactions from Russian diplomatic accounts, including two from former Ambassador to the US, Sergey Kislyak. The Russian foreign ministry responded to the story by calling on the US government to crack down on the leakers. [Read more from BuzzFeed News]

The NSA said it accidentally destroyed Bush-era data
“The NSA sincerely regrets its failure to prevent the deletion of this data.” That’s a snippet of the mea culpa from the Deputy Director of Capabilities of the National Security Agency, in regards to the fact that the agency destroyed surveillance data it was under orders to preserve. The story, which was first reported Friday night by Politico, explains that since 2007, “the NSA has been under court orders to preserve data about certain of its surveillance efforts that came under legal attack following disclosures that President George W. Bush ordered warrantless wiretapping of international communications after the 2001 terrorist attacks on the U.S. In addition, the agency has made a series of representations in court over the years about how it is complying with its duties. [Read more from Politico]

Public Citizen detailed the inflow of political money to Trump’s properties during his first year in office
On Tuesday, Public Citizen published a report titled “Presidency for Sale,” documenting “More than 60 trade groups, companies, religious groups, charities, foreign governments, interest groups and political candidates are spending money at President Donald Trump’s properties.” [Read the full report from Public Citizen here]

A DOT audit found that people responsible for sensitive information don’t know what information is sensitive.
The Department of Transportation possesses what its advisory committee once called, “some of the most sensitive and intimately revealing” consumer data, so when a report from the DOT Inspector General on the agency’s protection of privacy information comes in over the transom, it’s worth taking a look at. The auditors determined that 164 of the agency’s 464 computers contain personally identifiable information (PII) about the public and / or DOT employees, and found that there was a “lack of adequate privacy resources in place.” The auditors stated that, “The incomplete privacy plan for a system may result in the inappropriate collection, use, storage, sharing, and/or loss of PII resulting in substantial harm, embarrassment, and inconvenience to individuals and may lead to identity theft or other fraudulent use of the information.” Additionally, they found issues with training regarding privacy: “It became clear in the discussions that the privacy system personnel were not aware of what constitutes sensitive and non-sensitive PII.’ [Read more from the DOT OIG]

Florida Man
U.S. District Judge Marcia G. Cooke sentenced a Florida man to a year in prison for threatening to shoot members of a mosque in Miami Gardens. Gerald Wallace pleaded guilty in October to “one count of obstructing the free exercise of religious beliefs,” which you now know is a thing. [Read more from Courthouse News]